Beyond Benefits and Body Parts: Obamacare and Black Trans Health

Image courtesy of Ebony.com

This article, written by Renee Bracey Sherman, MPA ’15, originally appeared on EBONY.com

Starting today, open enrollment for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will set in motion a trifecta of change.  The ACA adds protections for many, expands coverage for services once considered rare, and ensures the vast majority of the population will receive affordable preventive care. With Black folks more likely to die from cancer, and higher rates of diabetes and heart disease, the preventive care made available in the ACA is crucial, but as gains are made for some, adequate health care is still a distant dream for many of the most vulnerable and misunderstood among us. Whether trying to get a basic doctor’s visit, mental health services, or HIV/AIDS related care, Black trans* people have an uphill and often dangerous battle.

The ACA deals with technical issues that have prevented many trans* individuals from obtaining insurance. It prevents insurance companies from turning away trans* health care seekers, dropping current clients from coverage because of their gender identity, and canceling trans* clients’ insurance due to paperwork mistakes, including misgendering a client or using a former name. This is great news, but for many, insurance is unaffordable and competent care is not available due to bias and inexperience.

Even when covered by a major health insurance company in the San Francisco Bay Area—the epicenter of cutting-edge trans* healthcare—it was difficult for Kelly Lewis to find competent care. “The doctor told me he didn’t feel comfortable prescribing shots, so he wanted to start me on the patches,” Lewis was told by a doctor when seeking testosterone hormones. “I felt that this physician was more of a gatekeeper than a provider,” he continued. After requesting to change doctors, Lewis was asked by the office to stay because the doctor wanted to learn about transgender healthcare—on his body. While the provider’s intent to learn more about trans* health care appeared noble, no one should have to be treated as an experiment especially given the sordid history of experimentation on Black bodies in this country. The lack of education among providers and the ongoing stigma facing Black trans* people factor prominently in health disparities in the Black trans* community—the ACA does not specifically address healthcare discrimination based on gender identity or expression,** which is a prevalent experience.

Before care is possible, simply affording insurance remains an issue. Thirty-four percent of Black trans* people earn less than $10,000 per year making co-payments, insurance premiums, and other healthcare costs not covered by the ACA out of reach. Nineteen percent of the Black and trans* communities under 65 are uninsured while a 2010 trans* discrimination survey found that 31% of Black trans* people were uninsured. While lack of health insurance is not the only factor in the health disparities these communities face, it is a major one.

Although more people will be accessing healthcare through state health exchanges and Medicaid expansion, the ACA does not address healthcare discrimination—a prevalent experience among trans* people. Twenty-one percent of Black trans* people have been refused medical care due to transphobic bias. A  2011 report found that 34% of respondents avoided seeking health care because they feared discrimination. But discrimination is not only relegated to blatant anti-trans* bias from providers and staff, it also exists in the medical community’s minimal knowledge and sensitivity around trans* issues. As Lewis experienced in seeking a knowledgeable provider, few medical staff have access to the necessary professional training to expand their scope of gender and their provider skillset. More accessible and knowledgeable training would allow the providers to serve a client based on the varied bodies of transwomen, transmen, and gender nonconforming people and their whole being—not just their body parts.

Read the entire piece on Ebony.com

Renee Bracey Sherman '15

Renee Bracey Sherman is a fellow at the Cornell Institute for Public Affairs (CIPA) pursuing a master's degree in public administration with a focus on social policy. She is the Digital Editor for The Cornell Policy Review, the Communications Chair for Women in Public Policy, and a student blogger for CIPA. She is also an advocate and freelance writer with Echoing Ida, a Black women's writing collective, on topics of reproductive justice, allyship, and abortion policy. She has been heard on the BBC Radio World Newshour, and her writing has been published on EBONY.com, Salon, RH Reality Check, Feministing.com, and Feministe.com. Most recently, she has been advocating for several healthcare bills in California. Renee holds a bachelor's degree in economics and sociology from Northeastern Illinois University, and serves on the board of directors of NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation.

View all posts