By: Alejandro J. Ramos, Anya Mateu-Asbury, Callie Jacobson
Edited by: Stephen Shiwei Wang
Introduction 1
In an era defined by democratic backsliding and the growing influence of authoritarian regimes, the question of how to reinvigorate democracy has become one of the most pressing issues of our time. Across the globe, the foundational principles of democracy—freedom, equality, and active civic participation—are under siege.2 Political polarization, the rise of digital disinformation, and the erosion of trust in institutions have created fertile ground for autocratic forces to exploit. At the same time, authoritarian regimes are leveraging sophisticated tools of propaganda and control to undermine democratic values and promote their own models of governance, presenting a direct challenge to the liberal democratic order.3
Despite these challenges, democracy’s resilience lies in its ability to adapt, self-correct, and find innovative ways to address evolving threats. This paper contends that media literacy and civic education are not merely supportive elements of democracy but essential tools in its revitalization.4 Fostering critical thinking, combating misinformation, and inspiring active participation in civic life are mechanisms that provide a robust defense against authoritarian encroachment and disengagement within democratic societies. Additionally, they hold the potential to inspire and empower the next generation of democratic citizens, further safeguarding democracy from future autocratic threats.
Through an examination of contemporary case studies, this research will illuminate how media literacy and civic education have strengthened democratic engagement in open societies and explore the deliberate suppression of such tools in authoritarian regimes, where their destabilizing potential threatens oppressive systems. Additionally, the paper will analyze significant challenges—political polarization, digital echo chambers, and resource inequities—that impede the implementation of these initiatives. By proposing innovative strategies such as leveraging social media, the gamification of civics, and youth-focused programs, this research aims to provide a pathway for making democracy appealing, accessible, and impactful in today’s complex landscape. Ultimately, this work seeks to empower educators, policymakers, and civil society organizations with actionable recommendations to ensure democratic resilience and vitality in the face of growing threats.
The Role of Media Literacy and Civic Education in Democracy
Democracy thrives on informed, engaged citizens who actively participate in the political process and hold their leaders accountable. However, the complexities of today’s information environment—marked by digital misinformation, polarized media, and algorithm-driven echo chambers—pose unprecedented challenges to democratic governance and the ability of individuals to comprehensively navigate the political system. Media literacy and civic education serve as indispensable tools in equipping citizens to confront these challenges while fostering critical thinking, promoting engagement, and building societal resilience against authoritarian threats.
Media Literacy: A Shield Against Disinformation
Media literacy empowers individuals to critically analyze the information they consume, equipping them to discern fact from falsehood in an era saturated with misinformation.5 The rapid spread of fake news, propaganda, and targeted disinformation campaigns has eroded trust in institutions and fueled polarization, undermining democratic processes. By teaching citizens how to evaluate the credibility of sources, identify biases, and understand the broader media ecosystem, media literacy strengthens their ability to make informed decisions.6
Media literacy also fosters digital resilience. It prepares individuals to question the motives and methods behind manipulative content, such as deepfakes or algorithmically curated echo chambers, which amplify divisive narratives. Countries that prioritize media literacy in their education systems, such as Finland, have seen positive outcomes in combating misinformation and maintaining high levels of public trust in democracy.7 In essence, media literacy is not merely an individual skill but a societal safeguard that protects democratic integrity.
Civic Education: Building Active Democratic Participation
While media literacy focuses on the critical consumption of information, civic education equips individuals with the knowledge and skills to participate actively in democratic life. It instills an understanding of political systems, civic rights and responsibilities, and the importance of engagement in community and national governance.8 Civic education builds the foundation for informed voting, effective advocacy, and meaningful involvement in public life.9
Beyond imparting knowledge, civic education cultivates a sense of agency and responsibility.10 Programs that engage young people in mock elections, public debates, or volunteer initiatives demonstrate the tangible impact of civic participation, fostering a lifelong commitment to democratic engagement.11 For example, an initiative in Boston, “Youth Lead the Change”, allocates $1 million per year for 85 young people ages 12-22 to manage funding projects proposed and voted on by youth that improve the city.12 In democratic societies, civic education and empowering young people to engage in government and their community strengthens the social fabric by promoting shared values of tolerance, equity, and accountability. By doing so, it counters the apathy and disengagement that often leave democratic institutions vulnerable to authoritarian influence.
The Synergy of Media Literacy and Civic Education
Media literacy and civic education are not standalone tools; their combined impact offers a powerful mechanism to fortify democracy. While media literacy equips individuals to critically assess information, civic education channels that understanding into constructive action. Together, they create informed, engaged citizens who are resilient against disinformation, capable of critical analysis, and motivated to participate in democratic processes.13
For example, the ACTS framework (Analyze, Create, then Share) examines social and civic issues within the context of media literacy to promote advocacy and civic engagement among students while strengthening vital media analysis skills..14 Programs that integrate civic education with media literacy—such as those that teach students to analyze political advertisements or fact-check news stories—equip participants with both the skills and the motivation to contribute to democratic life. This synergy not only enhances individual capabilities but also strengthens the collective resilience of democratic societies against internal and external threats.
A Pathway to Democratic Resilience
In an age of political polarization and digital disruption, the role of media literacy and civic education in democracy is more critical than ever. These tools provide individuals with the ability to critically navigate the information landscape, actively engage in civic life, and contribute to the preservation of democratic values. By integrating media literacy and civic education into national strategies, democracies can empower citizens to safeguard their institutions, resist authoritarian influence, and ensure the vitality of democratic governance for future generations.
Case Studies: Democratic vs. Authoritarian Contexts
The power of media literacy and civic education is best understood through a comparative analysis of their implementation in democratic and authoritarian contexts. Democracies have harnessed these tools to strengthen citizen engagement and trust, while authoritarian regimes have deliberately suppressed them to maintain control. By examining both approaches, the transformative potential of these tools becomes clear, as does their destabilizing effect on oppressive systems.
Democratic Initiatives: Strengthening Engagement
Democratic societies have increasingly recognized the value of media literacy and civic education in fostering an informed and engaged citizenry. For example, Ireland’s Citizen Assemblies provide a powerful model of participatory democracy.15 These assemblies bring together randomly selected citizens to deliberate on critical issues, such as abortion rights and same-sex marriage, combining media literacy with civic education to ensure participants are well-informed and prepared to contribute meaningfully. The success of these assemblies has demonstrated how integrating media literacy into civic engagement can lead to more inclusive and transparent decision-making processes.16
Similarly, Taiwan’s Sunflower Revolution illustrates the role of civic education in revitalizing democracy.17 When protesters stormed the parliament to oppose a controversial trade agreement, the government chose dialogue over repression, eventually incorporating activists into the decision-making process. This participatory approach not only diffused tensions but also strengthened democratic institutions by demonstrating that citizen engagement can lead to tangible outcomes.18 These examples highlight how democracies can use media literacy and civic education to make a government more accessible to its citizens, fostering trust and transparency.
Authoritarian Suppression: Silencing Dissent
In contrast, authoritarian regimes view media literacy and civic education as threats to their control and actively suppress these tools to limit citizen empowerment. China offers a stark example, where the government uses its media ecosystem to promote state-sanctioned narratives while censoring independent information.19 Through initiatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative,20 China extends this influence globally, leveraging economic investments to create dependencies and silence criticism.21 For instance, Montenegro’s agreement with China includes provisions requiring legal disputes to be resolved under Chinese law, effectively limiting the country’s sovereignty and exposing the broader risks of authoritarian influence.22
Russia employs similar tactics, using disinformation campaigns and political manipulation to undermine democratic institutions. In Montenegro, Russia has channeled illicit financing and media influence to deepen divisions and destabilize the region.23 This approach is not limited to Montenegro; it is part of a broader strategy to weaken democracies across Europe by exploiting social and political vulnerabilities.24 These regimes deliberately suppress media literacy and civic education because they recognize the destabilizing potential of an informed and engaged citizenry.
The Transformative Potential of Media Literacy and Civic Education
The stark contrast between democratic and authoritarian approaches underscores the transformative power of media literacy and civic education. In democratic contexts, these tools promote trust, transparency, and civic engagement, serving as a bulwark against apathy and polarization. In authoritarian regimes, their suppression reveals the profound threat they pose to systems reliant on control and manipulation.
These case studies demonstrate that media literacy and civic education are not merely educational tools but instruments of societal transformation. By fostering critical thinking and empowering citizens to participate in governance, they can strengthen democratic institutions and challenge authoritarian narratives. As democracies face growing internal and external pressures, the lessons from these examples highlight the urgency of prioritizing these tools to safeguard democratic values and inspire civic vitality.
Challenges to Implementing Media Literacy and Civic Education
Implementing media literacy and civic education faces significant challenges, including political polarization, digital echo chambers, disinformation campaigns, resource inequities, and authoritarian suppression. Political divides often frame these initiatives as partisan, limiting support and undermining trust.25 Digital echo chambers, amplified by social media algorithms, reinforce biases and limit exposure to diverse perspectives, which authoritarian regimes exploit to entrench control.26 Disinformation campaigns by states like Russia and China further erode trust in democratic institutions by manipulating narratives and destabilizing governments.
Resource inequities exacerbate these issues, leaving underserved communities without access to critical tools for democratic engagement.27 Meanwhile, authoritarian regimes actively suppress these programs to maintain control over information and limit civic empowerment.28 Addressing these challenges requires bipartisan efforts, international collaboration, and targeted investments to ensure equitable access and counter authoritarian narratives.
Innovative Strategies to Revitalize Democracy
Revitalizing democracy in an era of rising authoritarianism and democratic fatigue requires bold and innovative approaches that adapt to the challenges of today’s complex political and digital landscape. By leveraging technology, fostering youth engagement, and promoting inclusive and participatory initiatives, democracies can inspire renewed civic vitality and counter threats to their foundational principles.
Social media, often critiqued for amplifying misinformation and polarization, can be harnessed as a powerful tool to engage citizens and promote democratic values. Platforms like TikTok and Instagram have immense potential to reach younger audiences through engaging and informative content. By creating campaigns that demystify democratic processes and combat misinformation, governments and civil society organizations can use these platforms to foster critical thinking and promote civic engagement.29
Gamification offers another innovative way to engage citizens, particularly younger generations, in civic education.30 Interactive platforms that simulate democratic processes, such as mock legislative sessions or virtual debates, can make complex concepts accessible and engaging. These initiatives provide hands-on learning experiences that encourage individuals to see themselves as active participants in democracy.31
International collaboration and the formation of democratic alliances are equally critical to revitalizing democracy. Proposals such as the creation of a Democracy Caucus within the United Nations highlight the need for democracies to coordinate their efforts on issues such as sanctions and human rights. By acting collectively and supporting each other, democracies can resist authoritarian narratives and promote shared values on the global stage.32
Technological innovation must also play a central role in revitalizing democracy. Tools such as AI-driven content moderation and open data platforms can enhance accountability and trust in governance.33 For example, programs that teach citizens to identify deepfakes and verify the credibility of sources can empower individuals to navigate the complexities of the digital age. By investing in digital literacy and transparency initiatives, democracies can counter the pervasive influence of disinformation.34
Finally, the role of civil society cannot be overstated. Grassroots organizations, independent journalists, and community leaders are critical in expanding the reach of civic education and media literacy programs. By fostering partnerships with governments and the private sector, civil society can promote democratic resilience through initiatives that build trust and engagement. Supporting investigative journalism and public oversight is also vital to exposing authoritarian influence and preserving the integrity of democratic discourse.35 Revitalizing democracy requires innovative strategies that address the unique challenges of our time. By leveraging technology, engaging young people, promoting participatory governance, and fostering global collaboration, democracies can inspire renewed trust and participation. These efforts will ensure that democracy not only endures but thrives as a system of governance capable of meeting the demands of a changing world.
Conclusion
To ensure that democracy remains vibrant and resilient in the face of growing challenges, stakeholders must prioritize media literacy and civic education as tools for renewal. These recommendations, tailored to key actors, provide actionable steps to safeguard democratic values while serving as a concluding reflection on the path forward.
Educators must integrate media literacy and civic education into curricula at all levels, ensuring that students develop the critical thinking skills necessary to navigate complex information landscapes.36 Programs should focus on teaching students to evaluate sources, detect misinformation, and understand democratic processes. Leveraging technology, educators can create interactive and engaging learning experiences, such as gamified platforms and simulation exercises, that inspire participation and foster civic responsibility.
Policymakers should prioritize legislative and financial support for initiatives that promote media literacy and civic education. Investments in underserved communities are particularly critical to bridging resource gaps and ensuring equitable access. Policies must also address the broader challenges of disinformation and digital echo chambers by supporting transparency in social media algorithms and funding public awareness campaigns. Policymakers can further bolster democracy by encouraging bipartisan collaboration to depoliticize these efforts and build public trust.
Civil society organizations play a vital role in amplifying the impact of these tools. By organizing grassroots initiatives, partnering with schools, and facilitating public forums, these organizations can expand access to media literacy and civic education beyond formal classrooms. Supporting independent journalism and investigative reporting is equally crucial to maintaining accountability and exposing authoritarian influence. Civil society must also collaborate internationally to share best practices and strengthen global democratic networks.
As authoritarian regimes continue to expand their influence and exploit vulnerabilities in democratic systems, revitalizing democracy is not just a domestic challenge—it is a global imperative. Media literacy and civic education are foundational to building resilient, informed societies capable of resisting manipulation and promoting shared democratic values across borders. By acting collectively and persistently, educators, policymakers, and civil society organizations can ensure that democracy remains a dynamic force for good in a rapidly evolving world. These efforts, though challenging, represent the most effective pathway to sustaining the principles of freedom, equality, and civic vitality for generations to come.
Works Cited
1. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Tom Garrett, immediate past Secretary General of the Community of Democracies, for his invaluable mentorship and guidance on this project over the course of a semester. Additional thanks to Colombe Cahen-Salvador, Vanja Calović, and Johanna Kao for their insightful conversations, which inspired sections of this paper. – Alejandro J. Ramos
2. Repucci, Sarah, and Amy Slipowitz. 2021. “Democracy under Siege.” Freedom House. 2021. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2021/democracy-under-siege.
3. Adler, Paul S., Amr Adly, Daniel Erian Armanios, Julie Battilana, Zlatko Bodrožić, Stewart Clegg, Gerald F. Davis, et al. 2023. “Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Global Retreat of Democracy: A Curated Discussion.” Journal of Management Inquiry 32 (1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926221119395.
4. Eisen, Norman, Andrew Kenealy, Susan Corke, Torrey Taussig, and Alina Polyakova. 2019. “Preventing and Reversing Democratic Backsliding.” Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution.
5. De Abreu, Belinha. 2021. “Skills for Life: Media Literacy and Critical Thinking | Publications.” 2021. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/viewer/Skills-for-Life-Media-Literacy-and-Critical-Thinking.pdf; Sustainability Directory. 2025. “How Effective Is Media Literacy in Combating Misinformation?” Sustainability Directory (blog). February 11, 2025. https://sustainability-directory.com/question/how-effective-is-media-literacy-in-addressing-misinformation/.
6. O’Byrne, W. Ian, Laura Hilliger, and Doug Belshaw. 2023. “Promoting Informed Citizenship in a Connected World: Advancing Media and Information Literacy.” The Journal of Media Literacy, no. Media and Information Literacy: Enriching the Teacher/Librarian Dialogue (November). https://ic4ml.org/journal-article/promoting-informed-citizenship-in-a-connected-world-advancing-media-and-information-literacy/.
7. Bjola, Corneliu, and Krysianna Papadakis. 2020. “Digital Propaganda, Counterpublics and the Disruption of the Public Sphere: The Finnish Approach to Building Digital Resilience.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33 (5): 638–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1704221; Gross, Jenny. 2023. “How Finland Is Teaching a Generation to Spot Misinformation.” The New York Times, January 10, 2023, sec. World. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/10/world/europe/finland-misinformation-classes.html.
8. Ramos, Alejandro J. 2024. “Igniting Democracy: America’s Burning Need for Civic Education.” The Cornell Policy Review, February. https://www.cornellpolicyreview.com/igniting-democracy-americas-burning-need-for-civic-education/.
9. Ramos, Alejandro J. 2025. “Navigating the Public Commons: A Student Perspective on Democracy and Public Space.” The Journal of Media Literacy, March. https://ic4ml.org/journal-article/navigating-the-public-commons-a-student-perspective-on-democracy-and-public-space/
10. Branson, Margaret Stimmann. 1998. “The Role of Civic Education (Proposed Requirements).” September 1998. https://www.civiced.org/campaign-to-promote-civic-education/resources/the-role-of-civic-education-an-education-policy-task-force-position-paper-with-policy-recommendations-september-1998; Magill, Kevin Russel, Nate Scholten, Brooke Blevins, and Victoria Davis Smith. 2024. “The Importance of Civic Culture: Toward Intellectual Solidarity and Community Agency.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 19 (1): 139–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979221130431.
11. Generation Unlimited and Decent Jobs for Youth. 2020. “Young People’s Participation and Civic Engagement.” UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/evaluation/media/1581/file/A%20guide%20to%20action%20what%20works%20on%20adolescent%20and%20young%20people%20engagement.pdf; National Democratic Institute. 2024. “Civic Education Program Guidance.” https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/Final%20Version%20English_Updated2.0.pdf.
12. Generation Unlimited and Decent Jobs for Youth. 2020. “Young People’s Participation and Civic Engagement.” UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/evaluation/media/1581/file/A%20guide%20to%20action%20what%20works%20on%20adolescent%20and%20young%20people%20engagement.pdf
13. Karanfiloğlu, Mehmet, and Murat Sağlam. 2023. “Empowering Citizens Through Media Literacy: Countering Disinformation on Social Media.” In Media and Communication in the Digital Age: Changes and Dynamics, 65–76. Şehitkamil: Özgür Publications; Gillern, Sam von, Benjamin Gleason, and Amy Hutchison. 2022. “Digital Citizenship, Media Literacy, and the ACTS Framework.” The Reading Teacher 76 (2): 145–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2120.
14. Gillern, Sam von, Benjamin Gleason, and Amy Hutchison. 2022. “Digital Citizenship, Media Literacy, and the ACTS Framework.” The Reading Teacher 76 (2): 145–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2120.
15. Kelly, Alice, and Cliodhna Moore. 2022. “Up for Debate: The Irish Citizens’ Assembly.” Institute for Public Administration 24 (2): 2–4.
16. OECD. 2020. “Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions.” Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/innovative-citizen-participation-and-new-democratic-institutions_339306da-en/full-report.html.
17. Themelis, Spyros, and Tao-Chen Hsu. 2021. “Democratizing Politics and Politicizing Education: Critical Pedagogy for Active Citizenship in the Taiwanese Sunflower Movement.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 16 (2): 180–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197920915601.
18. Ibid.
19. Xu, Beina, and Eleanor Albert. 2017. “Media Censorship in China.” Council on Foreign Relations. February 17, 2017. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/media-censorship-china.
20. China Power Team. 2017. “How Will the Belt and Road Initiative Advance China’s Interests?” ChinaPower Project (blog). May 8, 2017. https://chinapower.csis.org/china-belt-and-road-initiative/.
21. Sutter, Karen M., Andres B. Schwarzenberg, and Michael D. Sutherland. 2024. “China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiative: Economic Issues.” Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11735.
22. Inboden, Rana Siu. 2023. “Defending the Global Human Rights System from Authoritarian Assault: How Democracies Can Retake the Initiative.” NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY. July 5, 2023. https://www.ned.org/defending-the-global-human-rights-system-from-authoritarian-assault-how-democracies-can-retake-the-initiative/.
23. Pritchett, Joanna. 2021. “Less Than a Full Deck: Russia’s Economic Influence in the Mediterranean.” Carngie Endowment for International Peace. July 21, 2021. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2021/07/less-than-a-full-deck-russias-economic-influence-in-the-mediterranean?lang=en; Branislav, Stanicek, and Anna Caprile. 2023. “Russia’s Influence in the Western Balkans: Geopolitical Confrontation, Economic Influence and Political Interference.” European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/747096/EPRS_BRI(2023)747096_EN.pdf.
24. Glenn, John K. 2023. “When Authoritarians Undermine Multilateral Institutions: The OSCE at 50.” Just Security. December 11, 2023. https://www.justsecurity.org/90577/when-authoritarians-undermine-multilateral-institutions-the-osce-at-50/.
25. Levine, Peter. 2023. “Politics by Other Means: Civic Education in a Time of Controversy.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 705 (1): 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162231189037.
26. Inboden, Rana Siu. 2023. “Defending the Global Human Rights System from Authoritarian Assault: How Democracies Can Retake the Initiative.” National Endowment for Democracy. July 5, 2023. https://www.ned.org/defending-the-global-human-rights-system-from-authoritarian-assault-how-democracies-can-retake-the-initiative/.
27. Garon, Thea, and Christina Plerhoples Stacy. 2024. “Civic Engagement Is Higher among Americans Who Are Financially Secure.” Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/civic-engagement-higher-among-americans-who-are-financially-secure; Schröder, Joris Melchior, and Michaela Neumayr. 2023. “How Socio-Economic Inequality Affects Individuals’ Civic Engagement: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Findings and Theoretical Explanations.” Socio-Economic Review 21 (1): 665–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab058; Holm, Eric Joseph van. 2019. “Unequal Cities, Unequal Participation: The Effect of Income Inequality on Civic Engagement.” The American Review of Public Administration 49 (2): 135–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018791217.
28. Inboden, Rana Siu. 2023. “Defending the Global Human Rights System from Authoritarian Assault: How Democracies Can Retake the Initiative.” NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY. July 5, 2023. https://www.ned.org/defending-the-global-human-rights-system-from-authoritarian-assault-how-democracies-can-retake-the-initiative/.
29. Ramos, Alejandro J., and Theodora Curtain. 2024. “Preparing the Next Generation: Civic Education and Youth Voter Turnout in the 2024 Election.” The Cornell Policy Review. November 14, 2024. https://www.cornellpolicyreview.com/preparing-the-next-generation-civic-education-and-youth-voter-turnout-in-the-2024election/.
30. Jash, Subhodeep, Richard Abisla, Aditya K. Kaushik, Sylvia Mishra, Ananth Padmanabhan, Pranesh Prakash, Tanvi Ratna, Joshua Simons, Madhulika Srikumar, and Kaliya Young. 2019. “Civic Futures 2.0: The Gamification of Civic Engagement in Cities.” The Promise of Public Interest Technology: New America. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep19980.12.
31. Kahne, Joseph, Ellen Middaugh, and Chris Evans. 2009. The Civic Potential of Video Games. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8518.001.0001.
32. Glenn, John K. 2023. “When Authoritarians Undermine Multilateral Institutions: The OSCE at 50.” Just Security. December 11, 2023. https://www.justsecurity.org/90577/when-authoritarians-undermine-multilateral-institutions-the-osce-at-50/.
33. Ubaldi, Barbara-Chiara, and Ricardo Zapata. 2024. “GOVERNING WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: ARE GOVERNMENTS READY?” OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/06/governing-with-artificial-intelligence_f0e316f5/26324bc2-en.pdf.
34. Inboden, Rana Siu. 2023. “Defending the Global Human Rights System from Authoritarian Assault: How Democracies Can Retake the Initiative.” NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY. July 5, 2023. https://www.ned.org/defending-the-global-human-rights-system-from-authoritarian-assault-how-democracies-can-retake-the-initiative/.
35. Glenn, John K. 2023. “When Authoritarians Undermine Multilateral Institutions: The OSCE at 50.” Just Security. December 11, 2023. https://www.justsecurity.org/90577/when-authoritarians-undermine-multilateral-institutions-the-osce-at-50/.
36. De Abreu, Belinha S. 2019. Teaching Media Literacy. American Library Association; Sperry, Chris. 2024. “Teaching Media Literacy in an Infodemic.” ASCD. November 1, 2024. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/teaching-media-literacy-in-an-infodemic.
Authors
Alejandro J. Ramos is a second-year MPA Candidate at Cornell University’s Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, where he serves as a Brooks Public Policy Fellow. Alejandro is deeply passionate about politics and public policy, with a particular focus on education policy. He actively holds three fellowships at Cornell, covering topics from democracy to systems thinking & modeling. Most notably as Inaugural Graduate Fellow, Cornell Brooks Center on Global Democracy under the supervision of Dr. Rachel Beatty Riedl. Ramos is also a Strategic Research Advisor at The Democracy Lab Foundation (DemoLab) based in Costa Rica.
In addition to his role at The Cornell Policy Review, Alejandro is the Executive Director of the Ramos Research Institute, an organization he founded at Cornell to advance research and dialogue in public policy. His recent publication, “A Path to Informed Democracy: Bridging Civic Engagement and Media Literacy,” has garnered significant attention in academic circles, with six recent academic conference presentations.
Alejandro’s academic and professional journey is marked by his dedication to making a meaningful impact on the world. He continues to contribute to academia through his leadership at the Cornell Policy Review and his ongoing research and advocacy efforts.
Anya Mateu-Asbury is a junior at Northwestern University where she majors in Social Policy with minors in Global Health and Data Science. She is passionate about policy research, with a particular focus on criminal justice reform.
Callie Jacobson, originally from New York, is a Senior at Smith College where she is a double major in Government and Philosophy. She currently serves as the Executive Editor of Smith’s Middle East Studies journal, Fusayfsa`. In the future, she hopes to work in policy analysis.
